Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
kb:chicago_style_versions [2008/11/21 15:12] – created ahowardkb:chicago_style_versions [2017/11/20 08:57] (current) – Remove Zotero 5 warning bwiernik
Line 1: Line 1:
-===I want to format my bibliography in Chicago style.  Zotero supports three different versions of that style (author-date, notes and bibliography, and notes without bibliography).  What are the differences between them?===+==== I need to use Chicago style. Which of the three versions that come with Zotero should I use====
  
-The differences often break down along disciplinary lines.  For example, the author-date format is frequently preferred by researchers in the physical, natural, and social sciences, while the notes and bibliography approach finds favor among researchers in literary, historical, and artistic fields.  Other factors may also influence a scholar's decision to choose one format over another: for exampleif a researcher elects to forgo a bibliography, either by choice or due to space limitations imposed by the publisher, she may instead adopt the Chicago note format (either endnotes or footnotesindependent of a bibliography In such a situation, full citation information would be included in the notes.  The different versions of the system are illustrated here:+Zotero ships with three variants of the Chicago style (formatted examples of each style are shown below). The //author-date// format is most popular in the physical, natural, and social sciences, whereas researchers in literary, historical, and artistic fields mostly use note-based stylesFor the note-based variantsthe notes can either be self-explanatory and come with or without a bibliography (//full note//), or serve as a reference to a bibliographic entry (//note//).
  
-== author-date ==+  * Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (author-date
 +    * **in-text citation**: (Adams 2002, 12) 
 +    * **bibliographic entry**: Adams, Douglas. 2002. //The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy//. New York: Del Rey. 
 +  * Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (full note) 
 +    * **note**: Douglas Adams, //The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy// (New York: Del Rey, 2002), 12. 
 +    * **bibliographic entry**: Adams, Douglas. //The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy//. New York: Del Rey, 2002. 
 +  * Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (note) 
 +    * **note**: Adams, //The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy//, 12. 
 +    * **bibliographic entry**: Adams, Douglas. //The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy//. New York: Del Rey, 2002.
  
-in-text documentation: (Jenkins 2006) \\  +{{tag>kb styles}}
-bibliographic entry: Jenkins, Henry.  2006.  //Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide// New York: NYU Press.+
  
-== bibliographic entry == 
- 
-Jenkins, Henry.  //Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide// New York: NYU Press, 2006. 
- 
-== note citation in a work without bibliography == 
- 
- 
-Henry Jenkins, //Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide// (New York: NYU Press, 2006), 56. 
- 
-== note citation in a work with bibliography == 
- 
-Jenkins, //Convergence Culture//, 56. 
kb/chicago_style_versions.1227298345.txt.gz · Last modified: 2008/11/21 15:12 by ahoward