Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- kb:chicago_style_versions [2011/04/24 17:48] – rmzelle
+++ kb:chicago_style_versions [2017/11/12 19:53] – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==== I need to use Chicago style. Which of the four versions that come with Zotero should I use? ====
+<html><p id="zotero-5-update-warning" style="color: red; font-weight: bold">We’re
+in the process of updating the documentation for
+<a href="https://www.zotero.org/blog/zotero-5-0">Zotero 5.0</a>. Some documentation
+may be outdated in the meantime. Thanks for your understanding.</p></html>
-The differences often break down along disciplinary lines.  For example, the author-date format is frequently preferred by researchers in the physical, natural, and social sciences, while the notes and bibliography approach finds favor among researchers in literary, historical, and artistic fields.  Other factors may also influence a scholar's decision to choose one format over another: for example, if a researcher elects to forgo a bibliography, either by choice or due to space limitations imposed by the publisher, she may instead adopt the Chicago note format (either endnotes or footnotes) independent of a bibliography.  In such a situation, full citation information would be included in the notes.  The different versions of the system are illustrated here:
-== author-date ==
+==== I need to use Chicago style. Which of the three versions that come with Zotero should I use? ====
-in-text documentation: (Jenkins 2006) \\
+Zotero ships with three variants of the Chicago style (formatted examples of each style are shown below). The //author-date// format is most popular in the physical, natural, and social sciences, whereas researchers in literary, historical, and artistic fields mostly use note-based styles. For the note-based variants, the notes can either be self-explanatory and come with or without a bibliography (//full note//), or serve as a reference to a bibliographic entry (//note//).
-bibliographic entry: Jenkins, Henry.  2006.  //Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide//.  New York: NYU Press.
-== bibliographic entry ==
+  * Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (author-date)
+    * **in-text citation**: (Adams 2002, 12)
-Jenkins, Henry.  //Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide//.  New York: NYU Press, 2006.
+    * **bibliographic entry**: Adams, Douglas. 2002. //The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy//. New York: Del Rey.
+  * Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (full note)
-== note citation in a work without bibliography ==
+    * **note**: Douglas Adams, //The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy// (New York: Del Rey, 2002), 12.
+    * **bibliographic entry**: Adams, Douglas. //The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy//. New York: Del Rey, 2002.
+  * Chicago Manual of Style 16th edition (note)
-Henry Jenkins, //Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide// (New York: NYU Press, 2006), 56.
+    * **note**: Adams, //The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy//, 12.
+    * **bibliographic entry**: Adams, Douglas. //The Ultimate Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy//. New York: Del Rey, 2002.
-== note citation in a work with bibliography ==
-Jenkins, //Convergence Culture//, 56.
 {{tag>kb styles}}