Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#935 closed defect (fixed)
Second citation with multiple authors doesn't display "et al."
| Reported by: | dstillman | Owned by: | erazlogo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | 1.0.4 |
| Component: | word integration | Version: | 1.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | simon |
Description
With any Author-Date format, citing a work with more than three authors displays "et al." in the first citation but reverts to displaying all names the second time.
This was apparently a new bug in 1.0.3.
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by simon
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by dstillman
- Cc simon added
- Owner changed from simon to erazlogo
- Status changed from new to assigned
Sorry, didn't check APA, but looks like Chicago and Harvard 1 have the problem.
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by erazlogo
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from assigned to closed
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
This is a bug in those styles. APA works fine, but in Chicago Author-Date, we have:
<option name="et-al-min" value="4"/> <option name="et-al-use-first" value="1"/> <option name="et-al-subsequent-min" value="6"/> <option name="et-al-subsequent-use-first" value="1"/>For 5 or 6 authors, we get "et al." on the first and not on the second.