Update tables created without "INTEGER PRIMARY KEY"

[dstillman]

For clarity, I wasn't using "INTEGER PRIMARY KEY" in tables that weren't using autoincrement functionality, but not using it keeps SQLite from just making that column name an alias for the internal rowid column--in other words, it creates an extra row.

May want to do this gradually to avoid large migrations.

[dstillman]

(In [1738]) Updated schema to use "INTEGER PRIMARY KEY" for all applicable rows -- for clarity, I wasn't using it for tables that weren't using autoincrement functionality, but not using it keeps SQLite from just making that column name an alias for the internal rowid column, resulting in an extra unnecessary column. Can't update existing tables now, but may in 1.5. (Refs #779, Update tables created without "INTEGER PRIMARY KEY")

[dstillman]

Milestone 2.0 Beta 3 deleted