id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,priority,milestone,component,version,resolution,keywords,cc
1624,Refine field order,dstillman,dstillman,"From Elena, once upon a time:

-----------------------------------------------

  * Title
  * Creators
  * Date
  * URI (the unique id you've been planning, when it's implemented)
  * User's Custom ID (if/when implemented)
  * Type
  * Publication
  * Publisher
  * Place
  * Volume
  * Issue
  * Pages
  * Location in Archive
  * Repository
  * Short Title
  * Abstract

For the rest, keep the same order.

Maybe we don't need Extra any more, since users can use Abstract or child notes--maybe the info can just be converted to a child note when removing this field?

I mostly thought in terms of main fields and those more likely to be entered manually (hence moved archival fields higher in the list), and I took into account requests at this discussion: http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/2567/

Don't think that Call No should be among the top fields, since it's mostly added automatically via the library catalog.

-----------------------------------------------",enhancement,new,minor,,interface,2.1,,,