As is argued in Kaufmann, "Mobility" (see above), three branches of social sciences (geography, transport science, and sociology) have traditionally employed 'mobility' as a category of analysis, each understanding the term slightly differently: 1) geography: "movement in space"; 2) transport science: "traffic flows"; 3) sociology: "change of social position or role"; And of course, they don't own the term, since it may be found in any dictionary with a variety of meanings. Yet as the artificiality of separating -- say -- migration from daily movement, or the history of transport from the history of social distinction -- has become more apparent, and as a range of other disciplines (academic and professional) have become more interested in understanding the role of movement in human life, the borderlines between these sub-disciplines are breaking down. The study of mobility has taken on a less topical, and more interdisciplinary character. As a result, this bibliography features works drawn from multiple traditions -- transport studies, geography, historical sociology and migration studies, as well as new, humanistic interrogations of movement as a cultural phenomenon. What this analytic breadth lacks in clarity, I hope, it will gain in interpretive power and interest.